Google to make privacy policy more clear after criticism from UK watchdog
Search giant is too vague about how it uses personal data, Information Commissioner’s Office says
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Google has been forced to change its privacy policy to be more clear about how the search giant uses the data is gathers.
The UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said that Google’s privacy policy was too vague about how it uses the information it has on users of its web services and products.
Google introduced a new privacy policy in 2012, pulling together the roughly 70 policies it had for all of its various services. But the ICO said that the policy was too unclear.
Google has now signed a commitment to make the policy clearer, the ICO said. It will make sure the policy adheres to the Data Protection Act and it will also take steps to make sure that future changes also comply.
Google has already made some changes suggested by the ICO. The rest must happen before June 30 2015, and then it will have to take yet more steps in the next two years.
“Whilst our investigation concluded that this case hasn’t resulted in substantial damage and distress to consumers, it is still important for organisations to properly understand the impact of their actions and the requirement to comply with data protection law,” said Steve Eckersley, head of enforcement at the ICO.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments