Google bans Glass at shareholder meeting
Tech giant shows that even they worry about the privacy concerns of their new hardware
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Privacy concerns regarding Google Glass have been heightened this week after the company first banned facial recognition for their hardware and then US casinos outlawed Glass over card-counting fears (that’s without even mentioning Google banning pornography on the device).
But now the one company that that you’d expect to be open-minded about the use of Glass – hint, it’s the one that’s trying to sell them to the world – has admitted that it too occasionally feels uncomfortable about the idea of always-on cameras being strapped to peoples’ faces.
At Google’s annual shareholders meeting yesterday afternoon in California attendees were banned from using any recording devices, meaning no cameras, no smartphones, and no Google Glass.
"Cameras, recording devices, and other electronic devices, such as smart phones, will not be permitted at the meeting. Photography is prohibited at the meeting," read the official instructions.
Despite the enjoyable irony of this, the news that even Google sometimes feel like saying no to Google Glass is reassuring. As the novelist and digital commentator Nick Harkaway commented on his blog:
“There’s an interesting point here: Google is acknowledging, right out of the box - in fact, before the box even ships - that there are contexts in which Glass is inappropriate. That is actually really good news.”
However, as Harkaway points out, the line between what’s acceptable to record and what’s not shouldn’t be limited just to events of “corporate confidentiality”. As Glass spreads (and it will) society as a whole will have to re-examine and re-instate the already blurred divisions between the public and the private. But at least Google are concerned too.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments