Facebook 'emotional contagion' study prompts official complaint from US privacy groups
Anger continues to spread as COO Sheryl Sandberg fails to apologise for study
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Digital rights groups in America have called on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate Facebook after it “purposefully messed with people’s minds” in a “secretive and non-consensual […] psychological experiment”.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) filed a complaint against the social network on Thursday, alleging that the study had violated the terms of Facebook’s 20-year agreement with the FTC to protect users’ privacy.
The actions of EPIC follow news that the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office has launched an inquiry into the “emotional contagion” study that changed the emotional content of users’ News Feeds to examine how positive and negative feelings spread through the site.
The continuing furore over the researcg has forced Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg to ‘express regret’ about how the study was communicated to the public – but not to apologize for conducting it in the first place.
“This was part of ongoing research companies do to test different products, and that was what it was; it was poorly communicated,” Sandberg told the Wall Street Journal. “And for that communication we apologize. We never meant to upset you.”
The disclosure of the study has led academics and lawyers to express concern that the company might be able to manipulate its users for purpose other than ‘research’.
Others, however, have suggested that the limited impact of the study (it produced “an average of one fewer emotional word, per thousand words, over the following week”) and the fact that Facebook’s News Feed is always being altered to test reactions mean that the public reaction is overblown.
In either case, Facebook is being consistently forced onto the back foot by the matter. It was also accused this week of accepting funding from the US military to carry out the study after it emerged that one of the key academics, Professor Hancock has previously been funded by the Minerva Initiative – a military research body that models large amounts of data to predict civil unrest.
Speaking to the Guardian, the University of Cornell - where the study was undertaken - confirmed that the professor did not receive military funding for the research. Facebook, it seems, will be busy putting out fires over this for some time to come.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments