Cigarette firms 'are using product placement on web'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tobacco companies may be using interactive websites such as YouTube to market their products to young people, according to a study.
Tobacco brands have always vehemently denied product placement on the internet, and several signed a voluntary agreement to restrict direct advertising online by the end of 2002.
But a study published online by the Tobacco Control journal found more than 20 "very professionally made" video clips in a YouTube search for any reference to five tobacco brands – Marlboro, L&M, Benson & Hedges, Winston and Mild Seven. Marlboro, L&M, Winston and Mild Seven are the top four brands by world sales.
Researchers analysed 163 clips from the first 20 pages of the search on YouTube, which has the largest market share of the online video market.
The clips included the 40 most viewed for Marlboro, Winston and Benson & Hedges, 24 English language videos for Mild Seven and 19 for L&M.
The videos associated with Marlboro were the most heavily viewed, attracting an average of almost 104,000 views and one had two million views. Almost three-quarters of the content (71 per cent) was "pro-tobacco", with less than 4 per cent classified as "anti-tobacco", the study found.
Most of the clips (70 per cent) contained images of people smoking branded products, and most contained brand content or the brand name.
The study's authors, from the University of Otago in New Zealand, said: "The arguments used to limit tobacco imagery in film and TV appear to apply to internet videos." They concluded: "Policy development by governments and/or the World Health Organisation is needed to encourage or require website operators to add pro-tobacco imagery or brand content to the material they will remove, to reduce youth exposure to such material."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments