And the winner is... Hollywood's favourite brand triumphs again
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Its products are a ubiquitous feature of modern life. So perhaps it is hardly surprising that, for the third year in succession, Apple products should have secured more appearances in box-office topping films in 2010 than any other brand.
According to Brandchannel.com, Apple products appeared in 10 of the 33 films which reached number one at the US box office last year.
Yet there is a sub-plot to this story. In percentage terms, that number was a reduction on 2009, when 19 Apple products were given a plug in 44 box office-topping films. In 2008, gadgets featuring the company's logo featured in 20 out of the 41 weekly chart-toppers.
Apple will hardly be worried. Its products still appeared more often than its nearest rivals, Nike, Chevrolet and Ford, making cameo appearances in hit films such as Iron Man 2 and Tron: Legacy. But the cooling of Hollywood's love affair with Apple is intriguing.
One explanation is that the studios may now be responding to hard cash rather than the cultural cachet surrounding Apple, which does not pay for product placement. It seems likely the technology giant simply does not need publicity any more. Its phones and computers actually have a disproportionate representation on screen – fewer than 15 per cent of US computer-owning households have one by Apple.
The company declined to say how its products found their way into films, but it was among the first to hire consultants to ensure that its Mac computers were well represented on the big screen.
The product placement industry is now worth nearly $4bn (£2.4bn) in the US, and Apple's rivals are employing their muscle. Sony Pictures Studios' film Resident Evil: Afterlife unsurprisingly delivered a large helping of product placement to the Sony VAIO laptop, at Apple's expense.
Some of last year's big hits delivered few opportunities for Apple to sneak in a plug – the iPhone would have seemed out of place on Pandora, the lush setting for James Cameron's Avatar. But the continued success of the iPad is expected to boost Apple's presence in next year's list. It has already featured in US television shows, including The American Office. Liz Lemon, the harassed television executive played by Tina Fey in the hit sitcom 30 Rock, also uses an Apple computer.
The most popular product placement opportunity among last year's hits was Iron Man 2. But with no fewer than 54 brands competing for screen space, including Google, Ferrari and Louis Vuitton, it's doubtful if Apple's presence registered with viewers.
Apple has regularly topped the list of the most conspicuous brands in Hollywood films. Its products have featured in more number one hits than McDonald's and Nike combined over the past decade. But Apple now faces competition from the likes of Sony, Dell, Land Rover, and Glock – a reflection of the shoot-outs dominant in action thrillers – whose products featured in nearly 15 per cent of the number one films of 2010.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments