Rhodri Marsden: The first sign of trouble was I couldn't find me
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.When websites are launched that claim to "take on the might of Google", the initial noise from within the industry tends to be that of suppressed laughter. How could any startup hope to compete with an internet giant that returns results for several hundred millions of queries every day, and whose name is synonymous with the act of searching the web? Names such as Vivisimo, Mahalo and Snap.com have wafted in and out of our consciousness, but Google remains the automatic choice.
Cuil has received huge publicity on account of being the brainchild of Google alumni, but the service will stand or fall on how it performs. And the reaction has been mixed.
The presentation of the search results – three neat columns, with a full paragraph of text and a relevant picture – is refreshingly informative in comparison to Google. However, one user complained yesterday that searching for a particular junior high school returned a picture of a T-shirt with "Boobs" written on it. And those who dislike Google's privacy policies have applauded Cuil's commitment not to collect information about our searching habits.
But despite claims that their index is vastly bigger than Google's, some have complained that Cuil returns fewer relevant results. What better way of testing this than the well-worn pastime of searching for one's own name: Google returns 442,000 results for "rhodri", with me in the coveted No 1 spot. Cuil, however, returns 131,453, and I'm nowhere to be seen. Whether that makes Cuil a more discerning, more useful search engine is a matter of personal opinion.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments