Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sainsbury's facing prosecution over excess packaging on beef joint

Pa
Thursday 16 September 2010 14:18 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Trading standards bosses today confirmed they are prosecuting a major supermarket for allegedly putting too much packaging on a joint of beef.

A Sainsbury's store in Tritton Road, Lincoln, is accused of failing to meet the "essential requirements" of packaging.

A court hearing is due to take place on October 13, an official at Lincoln Magistrates' Court confirmed.

The charge states the store, on or before February 17, placed packaging on the market which did not meet essential requirements.

It said: "Namely the packaging volume of a Taste the Difference Slow Matured Ultimate Beef Roasting Joint was not limited to the minimum adequate amount to maintain the necessary level of safety, hygiene and acceptance for the said beef roasting joint."

Peter Heafield, head of Trading Standards at Lincolnshire County Council, said they investigated the matter after a complaint from a customer.

He said: "Excessive packaging on goods can cause unnecessary damage to the environment and increases costs associated with recycling and landfill.

"Lincolnshire County Council has a duty to enforce regulations which require businesses to review and reduce their packaging so that items are packaged only in a way that is necessary for issues such as protection of the product and consumer acceptance.

"The council's Trading Standards service has worked to help and support many businesses in reducing their packaging where possible.

"Following a consumer complaint about a product available in Sainsbury's, Trading Standards carried out an investigation which has resulted in the matter being brought before the court."

But today Sainsbury's said it was "surprised" by the council's comments.

"We are surprised at the comments made by Lincolnshire County Council, which do not reflect the very positive outcome of our meeting with Lincolnshire's packaging team," a spokesman said.

"In fact, we have been informed that the council, in light of that meeting, is currently looking again at whether it will proceed.

"We were particularly surprised, as the packaging of the product in question has been reduced by 53% since February and is set to be reduced by at least another 10% within the next few months.

"Reducing packaging is a key part of our environmental commitments, which is why we have set an industry-leading target to reduce it by a third by 2015, and we've made great progress to date.

"For example, by stocking basics cereal in bags rather than boxes, we save 165 tonnes of cardboard per year without affecting the quality of the product.

"Packaging is essential to ensure food remains fresh and undamaged, thereby preventing food waste, and we are committed to finding ways to reduce it while ensuring it remains functional."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in