Ready To Wear: Various cultures view the female form entirely differently

Susannah Frankel
Monday 27 September 2010 00:00 BST
Comments
(PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Is fashion meant to be flattering?

If Fashion Fringe winner, Corrie Nielsen's collection is anything to go by, then the answer is a resounding no. One particular big, bouncing and presumably inflatable bottom ruled this particular outing. "Does my bum look big in this?" Oh yes indeed.

We all know, of course, that various ages and cultures view the female form entirely differently. In the Western world alone, bustles, panniers, exaggerated shoulders and more have all gone to prove in their time that pencil-thin is not always the ideal. Today, however, it appears quite unshakeable, making for not only some pretty inhuman dietary restrictions but also fashion that is not always as interesting as it might be.

Consider the success of Roland Mouret's "galaxy" dress. In the mid-Noughties this one garment appeared on the back of everyone from Demi Moore to Scarlett Johansson and from Victoria Beckham to Carol Vorderman (but don't let that put you off). Why? Because it held them in and, er, pushed them out in all the right places. With its clever underpinnings it transformed its wearer into a pin with proudly upstanding Barbie Doll breasts, whatever their natural shape and size. Skinny jeans, equally, are one woman's meat and another's poison. The clue's in the name: only the skinny need apply or, as Grazia once memorably put it, best avoid this particular style if you're over a jeans size 30. That's a 12, incidentally, ruling out the majority of women, in this country at least.

There are, thankfully, some designers who have more on their minds than simply slim, dark clothes that may appear commercial but are, in fact, not only ubiquitous but also, to many, alienating. Miuccia Prada has used fabrics she has in the past described as "fattening – but I don't care" because they are pioneering, sensual and extraordinary. Comme des Garçons' Rei Kawakubo's current collection is largely padded, and in a rather more confrontational way than the average Puffa.

At last week's London collections alone, Betty Jackson gave the world feathered trousers that were in no way slender. And for every diaphanous, bias-cut chiffon sweet-nothing there was a lovely, big frilly tent. There's more to a fashionable life than simply being a size 6, then. And that can only be a good thing.

s.frankel@independent.co.uk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in