Kubrickian couture: The catwalk owes a lot to the late director
Stanley Kubrick had an exacting eye, for which costume was understandably key, say Alexander Fury
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.You don't think fashion when you think of Stanley Kubrick. You think of The Overlook Hotel's near-endless corridors, Alex and his marauding droogs in A Clockwork Orange, or the waltzing retro-futuristic technologies of 2001: A Space Odyssey. Unlike the dapper jodhpured likes of Cecil B DeMille, the director's director was no fashion plate, habitually bearded in down-at-heel clothing.
Nevertheless, Kubrick had an exacting eye, for which costume was understandably key. Several were presented earlier this year at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art in an exhibition titled, simply, Stanley Kubrick. 2001: A Space Odyssey called for precision: British royal couturier Hardy Amies was drafted in to create them. Marisa Berenson was banned from sunbathing for months before Barry Lyndon began filming, and Kubrick himself was said to have suggested Malcolm McDowell sport his jockstrap over his trousers for the instantly recognisable costumes of A Clockwork Orange.
That instant recognition is important. Even if Kubrick himself wasn't fashionable, and his films were costume rather than fashion per se, they have become intrinsic parts of the fashion landscape. Think Lolita, and it's the heart-shaped sunglasses of Kubrick's incarnation that leap to mind.
It's not just pop-culture sartorial referencing. The influence of Kubrick's oeuvre on contemporary catwalks seems endless. A favourite are the malevolent ghosts of the Grady twins from The Shining: last October, almost-identical models descended two-by-two on vast escalators at Louis Vuitton, while in 1999, Alexander McQueen offered a doppelgänger duo marching hand-in-hand down an ice catwalk. He called that show The Overlook.
Of course, the cinematic bent of McQueen's imagination, combined with his love of the macabre, made him and Kubrick ideal bedfellows. But such is the aesthetic richness of Kubrick's celluloid world, many other designers have been pulled in. The director has even spawned an adjective – Kubrickian – used liberally by fashion journalists. It has described everything from the vast, geometric carpet that smothered the catwalks of Miuccia Prada's autumn/winter 2012 men's and womenswear shows, to the peculiarly Sixties pairing of saturated tomato-orange with acres of disco-futuristic white.
There are two arguments for its prevalence. Fashion designers often alight on the same influences. If they're thinking Sixties, they're usually cribbing from A Space Odyssey and Qui êtes-vous, Polly Maggoo?. That's the cynical view. It also doesn't give Kubrick credit for the strength of his vision. His is the kind of eye bound to influence future generations. Steven Spielberg put it best: "In the whole history of movies, there has been nothing like Kubrick's vision... It was a gift to us, and now it's a legacy". Fashion included.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments