Legal battle over Rwanda refugee plan is just the beginning

The legality of Priti Patel’s scheme could end up in the hands of the ECHR, says Sean O’Grady

Thursday 09 June 2022 20:35 BST
Comments
Migrants are still arriving at Dover despite the threat of deportation (Gareth Fuller/PA)
Migrants are still arriving at Dover despite the threat of deportation (Gareth Fuller/PA) (PA Wire)

Hardly is the ink dry on the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 than its enforcement has been passed to the High Court for judicial review.

Whether they’re called “left wing activists” or “lawyers doing their job,” they have succeeded in at least temporarily delaying the first plane-load of refugees being sent to Rwanda.

The policy is so unusual and arguably inhumane that it was inevitable it would end up in the courts. It is equally to be expected both that the Home Secretary should be hopping mad and that the legal action be the subject of lurid newspaper headlines. If the policy is purely performative and designed to stoke up a “culture war” as critics claim, then it has already had that effect.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in