Moving the House of Lords has nothing to do with serving the north – it’s a threat to peers

The subtext seems to scream ‘screw with us by blocking our legislation, you daft old fossils, and we’ll condemn you and your ermine-lined zimmers to countless 400-mile round trips to York’

Matthew Norman
Sunday 19 January 2020 23:38 GMT
Comments
James Cleverly hints House of Lords could be permanently moved to the north of England

Brave New World is universally regarded as one of the classics of dystopian fiction, but for the life of me, I’ve never understood why.

Admittedly, the government in Aldous Huxley’s novel is no beacon of benign democracy. But it never mooted transferring the House of Lords to York (or Birmingham, or one of Saturn’s rings; the details remain sketchy). Best of all, if not for the best of reasons, it made the oblivion drug soma freely available to citizens.

If someone offered you a dose that would put you into a coma for four and a bit years, or however long it takes to rid Downing Street of the Johnson-Cummings Axis powers, you would, in the parlance of the football pundit, rip their arm off.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in