Hilliard Ensemble/Chilingirian Quartet, Wigmore Hall, London

Michael Church
Tuesday 14 April 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The great musical sequence Haydn composed to frame the Seven Last Words is a challenge to anyone performing it in this irreligious age.

Each of Christ's words was originally the text for a devotional discourse by a bishop who would then fall to his knees before the altar: in the intervals between utterances, there would be an atmospheric musical interlude. Haydn composed the work for a large orchestra in Cadiz; then he rearranged it for string quartet, as he wanted this majestic music to have the widest possible dissemination.

Lasting 70 minutes, it can stand on its own, but as each section is a slow adagio (apart from the concluding "earthquake") people feel obliged to jazz it up: sometimes with biblical readings, sometimes with poems, as Andrew Motion did, with predictably iffy results. But the Wigmore had a brainwave: as Gesualdo's "Responsoria" were also written for performance in Holy Week, and as both sequences were designed to be performed in sepulchrally blacked-out churches, what more natural than to interweave them? And, as the Hilliard were leaders in Gesualdo performance, why not enlist them? They and the Chilingirian would be each other's foil.

But the problem that arose when the singers opened their mouths was simply one of mismatch. Haydn was the perfect court composer, Gesualdo condemned by his X-rated misdeeds – publicly disembowelling his wife and murdering her lover – to take his musical pleasures in disgraced solitude. Both were daringly experimental for their time, but while Haydn's experimentalism had a poised Baroque grace, Gesualdo's wildly lurching chromaticism still sounds freaky today.

After the magnificent groundedness of Haydn's "Introduction", we plunged into very murky waters. The Hilliard's singing had none of the clarity that made their recording of this music so successful: the counter-tenors sounded strained, and the intonation at times so wayward as to seem almost unpitched. And so it went on: 10 minutes of chiaroscuro beauty followed by 10 minutes in which complex musical lines were smudged and clouded. Gesualdo would have had boy singers for the soprano parts, plus the benefit of a resonant church acoustic: this car-crash of a concert would have pleased neither him nor Haydn.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in