Seagull cull blocked by Court of Appeal
The killing of 552 pairs of lesser black-backed gulls was backed by the Government
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A controversial cull of seagulls to lower the risk of bird strike to aircraft has been blocked by the Court of Appeal.
The killing of 552 pairs of lesser black-backed gulls in Lancashire was sanctioned by the former Environment Secretary Owen Paterson at the request of aerospace company BAE Systems.
Further operations were also authorised to maintain the population at a reduced level, provided it did not fall lower than 3,348 pairs.
The High Court last year dismissed claims by the RSPB that the cull was unlawful and would set a dangerous precedent. The charity feared the plans could lead to further bird culls elsewhere.
But three appeal judges have unanimously overturned the High Court, ruling that Mr Paterson’s decision, made in May 2013, was “fatally flawed”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments