Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Save the ash tree? Half of us can’t even recognise an oak

An appeal for the public to report tree disease has merely revealed our arboreal ignorance

Emily Beament
Friday 12 July 2013 10:50 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

More than four-fifths of people cannot identify an ash tree from its leaves and almost half cannot recognise an oak, a survey has revealed.

Members of the public are being encouraged to report signs of diseases such as ash dieback which are threatening British trees, as part of efforts to tackle infections which could wipe out millions of the nation’s trees.

But many people cannot even identify some of the UK’s most common trees at risk, a YouGov poll conducted for the Woodland Trust suggests.

Only 17 per cent recognised an ash leaf, despite the high profile of Chalara ash dieback, which experts have warned could be as devastating as Dutch elm disease.

And 57 per cent could not identify an oak, one of the country’s most common and recognisable trees. Oaks are at risk from disease such as acute oak decline, which causes bleeding and lesions on stems and tree death.

Fewer than two-fifths (39 per cent) of young people could identify an oak and only one in 10 identified an ash. Older people did better: more than two-thirds (68 per cent) of over-55s identified an oak and almost a quarter (23 per cent) recognised an ash.

Those in north-east England and Northern Ireland struggled most to identify oak leaves, with just 40 per cent getting it right, while fewer than one in 10 (9 per cent) people in the North-east could identify an ash.

The Woodland Trust warns that a ignorance of trees among members of the public could hamper efforts to stop the spread of tree pests and diseases; the UK is plagued by 15 such diseases and five more could be on their way.

Austin Brady, head of conservation at the trust, said: “We are relying on people to report the signs of disease and pests in their local woods, so if more people were able to identify common trees like ash and oak, it would make tracking the spread easier.

“We are calling for increased education on native trees and disease identification before it’s too late. We need to learn about and love trees and woods or we risk losing them.”

* Leaf test answers to image above: A. Ash; B. Oak; C. Sycamore; D. Birch; E. Beech; F. Hawthorn

* People can test their tree knowledge online and watch a video with the wildlife presenter Simon King on identifying ash and oak trees at the Woodland Trust’s website, www.loveitorloseit.org.uk website


PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in