Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Performing whales are not 'slaves', says US judge

 

David Usborne
Friday 10 February 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments
Tilikum the orca performs at SeaWorld in Orlando, Florida
Tilikum the orca performs at SeaWorld in Orlando, Florida (REUTERS)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

The grand emancipation of America's popular performing orcas has been postponed, thanks to the not-so-startling conclusion of a district court judge in San Diego that, on balance, whales and humans are not the same thing.

That the issue ever reached the chambers of Judge Jeffrey Miller was the work of the animal rights group, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, which filed a suit against SeaWorld, the aquatic theme park chain. Peta alleged that by holding the whales in concrete tanks and obliging them to "work" several times a day entertaining tourists, SeaWorld was violating the 13th amendment to the American constitution, which bans slavery.

By the standards of the US legal system, the answer came very quickly. Nice try, but the 13th amendment, adopted after the US Civil War, pertains to humans and not animals.

Meanwhile, take with a pinch of salt any profession of disappointment from Peta. This was a legal foray that produced a public relations splash, never mind the outcome. Dismissing the lawsuit, filed on behalf of five killer whales, Judge Miller was to the point. "The only reasonable interpretation of the 13th amendment's plain language is that it applies to persons, and not to non-persons such as orcas," he said.

SeaWorld welcomed the ruling, saying: "We cannot hope this is Peta's last publicity stunt but we can now refocus our energy in more positive and constructive ways: delivering high-quality education experiences to our guests and providing the highest possible standard of care to our animals."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in