Giant turbine blades likely to claim lives of migrating geese
There is no doubt that the giant turbines will kill some pink-footed geese, which migrate to Britain during the winter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Plans for two giant wind turbines that threaten to claim the lives of scores of pink-footed geese every year were today given the go-ahead by the High Court despite a legal challenge by local residents at Eagland Hill in Lancashire. The proposed turbines will be located about 5km from Morecambe Bay where a special protection area hosts a range of birds, including pink-footed geese.
The geese travel inland for up to 10km from their roosting sites on the north-west coast to feed on grain and winter cereal crops. They feed in fields adjacent to where the £50m giant turbines will stand, 80 metres high at the hub, with a blade tip height of 125 metres.
A judge heard all sides are agreed there is a risk that geese will collide with the turbines. But the developers, Cornwall Light and Power Company Ltd, were eventually given the go-ahead by a Government planning inspector after agreeing to provide compensatory feeding grounds for the geese.
The anti-turbine Eagland Hill Action Group (EHAG) fought a last-ditch High Court bid to block the scheme, arguing that the inspector, David Pinner, erred in law by failing to reconsider whether an environmental impact assessment was necessary, and failing to conduct an appropriate assessment under EU wild birds and habitats directives.
EHAG also argued there was procedural unfairness because the group had not been invited to take part in the discussion on the compensation proposals for the geese. Today Mr Justice Pelling, sitting as a High Court judge in Manchester, rejected all the grounds of the challenge.
Campaigners had hoped for a successful outcome after plans to build another nine 100-metre tall wind turbines on the borders of Exmoor National Park were thrown out in June, after a five-year battle by local residents. The decision came as a study continued to investigate the potential risk posed by planned offshore wind farms to another rare goose species.
Five barnacle geese have been fitted with electronic tags to track their migratory flight paths, which conservationists fear will cross sites earmarked for large offshore wind farms in the Firth of Forth and off the coast of Norway.
The pink-footed goose is not a native British species, but large numbers of the birds spend the winter here, arriving from breeding grounds in Spitsbergen, Greenland and Iceland.
The geese arrive in the UK in October, nesting along estuaries on the east and west coast. It is feared that as many as 50 geese a year could collide with the new turbines, which will impinge on their migratory flight paths.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments