Heathrow 13 climate change protesters avoid jail in 'triumph for democracy'
Anti-expansion group handed six-week suspended sentences after being told a custodial sentence was 'almost inevitable'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The nightmare has been ended for the Heathrow 13 as they were narrowly spared jail for their high-profile protest against the London airport’s expansion.
District Judge Deborah Wright astonished many legal observers last month by warning that a custodial sentence was “almost inevitable” for the peaceful demonstrators.
But the public outcry against her remarks appeared to have cut through, as she handed the protesters six-week suspended sentences,
Rob Basto, who at 68 is the oldest member of the Heathrow 13, was perhaps the most relieved of the group as the judge returned from three hours of final deliberations at Willesden Magistrates’ Court to inform them that they would be spending the night at home rather than prison. Asked by The Independent what he planned to do with his evening of freedom, he said: Mr Basto replied: “I haven’t thought that far ahead. What day is it? Thursday? I think I’ll just do nothing and chill out. This will be the first day for ages when I haven’t been worried.
“It’s been a very stressful seven or eight months but it’s also been amazing. My co-defendants are amazing, the support has been amazing and I feel that it’s really got people talking about climate change,” he added.
The judge’s announcement of the non-custodial sentence transformed the mood of the court in an instant and there was loud cheering as the defendants left the dock to return to their friends and family who had come to watch the proceedings.
Ella Gilbert, another member of the group, who recently finished an MA in climate change at the University of East Anglia, said: “I feel good. It’s been a bit of a rollercoaster of a day – well, months really – with lots of suspense. We did what we did for a reason and it’s really helped the cause.”
David Thacker, the father of one of the 13 – Edward – who was not involved in the protest himself, said he was immensely proud of his son but had mixed feelings about the sentence.
“I have enormous pride and admiration for the way he has dealt with this – and I’m of course relieved because prison would have been appalling. But I’m also angry because I think the judge has missed the point,” said Mr Thacker.
He believes that a suspended sentence is still far too harsh for a peaceful environmental protest.
The judge sentenced the protesters to six weeks in prison, suspended for 12 months – meaning that as long as they don’t break their conditions or commit another offence the threat of jail will lift in a year.
The conditions include not going within 500m of any Heathrow terminal building or within 5m of the perimeter fence, which they cut through as part of their protest last July before making their way on to the north runway.
They are also ordered to carry out between 120 and 180 hours of unpaid work, depending on whether this was a first offence or they had previous convictions – which three of them do.
Judge Wright strongly criticised the protesters for causing huge and costly disruption when they grounded 25 flights at Heathrow last summer. But she paid tribute to their integrity and conviction, saying there is no doubt they are all committed to tackling global warming and very genuinely believe they are acting in the best interest of society.
She said that 92,000 passengers were inconvenienced to a greater or lesser degree by their actions, which in some cases was bound to have meant that people on their way to see sick relatives or attend funerals would have faced delays which added to their anxiety.
“I can’t fail to be impressed by the quality of references received for all defendants... But the fact that you are principled and have strong views about public interest doesn’t mean you can break the law,” she said.
“Each and every one of those people who had their journeys disrupted was a victim of your actions,” she added.
Last month, Judge Wright caused an uproar when she found the group guilty of aggravated trespass – and warned them to expect a prison sentence.
It would have been the first time peaceful environmental protesters had gone to jail for the offence of aggravated trespass since it came into force two decades ago.
Before the sentencing, around 300 supporters gathered at the front of the court to offer their support.
As the Heathrow 13 left the court afterwards many of them were still there.
Standing outside the court Danielle Pafford, one of the group, said: “I’m so relieved. It’s a triumph for democracy; a triumph for the movement.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments