Australian government announces £35m plan to save Great Barrier Reef
New funding programme will combat pollution and outbreaks of crown-of-thorns starfish, but lack of focus on climate change has been criticised by environmentalists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An AUS$60m (£34.6m) rescue plan to save the Great Barrier Reef has been announced by the Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.
The package, which will be rolled out over the course of 18 months, will be used partly to fight the outbreak of crown-of-thorns starfish, which are known to contribute to the decline of corals.
Other proposed uses of the money included increasing the number of reef patrol officers and reducing pollution from chemicals used in farming that seep into the water.
The new programme, announced in the northeastern Queensland city of Townsville, also included a contribution to new research into coral.
However, environmentalists have accused the prime minister of missing the most important contributor to coral decline, namely global warming.
A previous round of funding – AUS$50m (£29m) in total – was released in early 2016, and this too focused on improving the resilience of the reef by helping to reduce agricultural runoff.
“Maximising the health and resilience of the ecosystem will help the Reef to withstand pressures such as the high sea surface temperatures that are causing the current coral bleaching event,” said then-environment minister Greg Hunt.
The Great Barrier Reef has been hit hard by bleaching events in recent years, which have been linked with rising global temperatures.
While the Government has acknowledged the harmful impact of climate change on coral, environmental groups have said the new plan distracts attention from the real problems afflicting the reef.
Greenpeace Australia Pacific said: “Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s decision to pay farmers up to $60 million to reduce sediment runoff to the Great Barrier Reef is the kind of tinkering around the edges approach that has failed in the past and does nothing to address the cause of devastating coral bleaching.”
“Rather than engaging in piecemeal exercises that ignore the biggest threat to the Reef, Malcolm Turnbull should place the interests of all Australians ahead of the profits of coal barons by embracing renewable energy and saying no to new coal projects,” said Greenpeace Australia pacific climate and energy campaigner Dr Nikola Casule.
Dr Casule described the measures proposed by Mr Turnbull as “fantasy solutions that ignore the real issue”.
Green senator Andrew Bartlett agreed that the new programme missed the biggest issue when it came to coral conservation.
“If Malcolm Turnbull was serious about protecting the Great Barrier Reef he would listen to scientists and transition away from the real reef-killer, the fossil fuel industry,” he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments