Arctic drilling: Royal Dutch Shell granted final permit for exploration of possible oil reserves off Alaska
US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has said there is a 75 per cent chance of 'one or more large spills' within 10 years of drilling in the area
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Barack Obama has been accused of contradicting his commitment to tackle climate change after Royal Dutch Shell was granted the final permit required for deep drilling into possible oil reserves in the Arctic.
The US Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, America’s offshore regulator, on Monday awarded the company the final permit required to drill into rocks at the Burger J well in the Chukchi Sea off the north-west coast of Alaska.
Shell restarted its shallow-drilling operations in the area on 30 July, but US safety standards have until now prevented it from sinking a well deep enough to strike oil until a key safety mechanism, called the Fennica, was in the Chukchi Sea. Experts say the Fennica, described as a “capping stack”, could be used to seal the well in the event of a leak.
Campaigners have reacted angrily to the decision, blaming the Obama administration for drilling in the Arctic, which activists say risks damaging the local environment.
The US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has said there is a 75 per cent chance of "one or more large spills" within 10 years of drilling in the area.
Friends of the Earth climate campaigner Marissa Knodel said: “Today’s decision makes it final: President Obama is willing to allow the pristine Chukchi Sea to become an energy sacrifice zone and worsen climate disruption.
“President Obama should know better — Shell has no business in our Arctic Ocean, and he will bear responsibility for the damage that Shell wreaks there.”
Michael Brune of the Sierra Club, another US environmental group, said the permit award “goes against science, the will of the people, and common sense”. He added: “This fight is far from over.”
Nonetheless the move is likely to be seen internally as a major step forward for the company, which has spent around $7bn on its plans to explore the Arctic, without yet being able to complete a single well. The firm's chief executive, Ben van Beurden, acknowledged to the BBC earlier this year that there were risks involved in Arctic drilling, but said he had gone on a "personal journey" before reaching the decision.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments