Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

analysis

Cop26: What is in the fine print of the UK-led deal to end coal-fired power?

Climate correspondent Daisy Dunne takes a closer look at the UK’s claims that the end of coal is ‘in sight’

Friday 05 November 2021 00:43 GMT
Comments
Activists dressed as Pikachu took to Glasgow on Thursday to protest against coal use in Japan
Activists dressed as Pikachu took to Glasgow on Thursday to protest against coal use in Japan (AP)

It is day four of the Cop26 climate summit, and coal – the single largest driver of global temperature rise – is dominating conversations.

Last night the UK government said that 190 countries, regions and companies had now agreed to take measures to end their use of the world’s dirtiest fossil fuel. Today, it was confirmed that at least 23 countries had made new commitments to phase out coal power. This includes five of the world’s top 20 coal-using countries.

Although the shift away from coal represents climate progress, the headline figures hide a lot of caveats. For example, the world’s biggest coal user, China, is not part of the new commitments. Neither are the US, India or Australia.

And UK minister and Cop president Alok Sharma today confirmed that the 190-strong coalition is a catch-all for countries and companies signed up to various different agreements.

It includes signatories to the Powering Past Coal Alliance (PPCA), a four-year-old initiative that the UK co-chairs with other countries including Chile and Singapore. The PPCA has in the past been accused of greenwashing.

Others have signed up to the new UK-led Cop26 Coal to Clean Power transition statement. This agreement includes four goals:

  • To rapidly scale up clean power generation
  • To phase out coal, in the 2030s for rich economies and in the 2040s for developing countries
  • To stop building new coal-fired power plants
  • To ensure workers employed by the coal industry are not left behind

But a closer look at the text reveals that signatories do not have to commit to every clause. For example, Indonesia has agreed to every clause except for the commitment not to build new coal-fired power stations.

And observers have also raised concerns about the second clause in the statement. A landmark report from the International Energy Agency previously said that rich nations should phase out coal by 2030 at the latest, with the rest of the world joining by 2040, if the world is to reach net zero.

What’s more, today officials conceded that there was some “flexibility” in the 2030 and 2040 phase-out commitments.

Poland, a major coal-using country that has signed up to the new commitment, has just announced that it does not plan to phase out the fossil fuel until 2049 – the latest possible date for developing countries.

“The small print seemingly gives countries enormous leeway to pick their own phase-out date, despite the shiny headline,” said Juan Pablo Osornio, head of Greenpeace’s delegation at Cop26.

“A plan to end coal by 2030 at the latest is what’s needed for Poland, Germany, and the rest of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. And a solid commitment is needed from all governments to end new coal, oil and gas projects immediately so we have a chance of keeping global warming limited to 1.5C.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in