End of the World Night, TV review: More eye-catching hyperbole than serious prophecy
The title refers to a list programme counting down the 10 greatest threats to humanity, with a little help from the experts and Hollywood disaster movies
Your support helps us to tell the story
My recent work focusing on Latino voters in Arizona has shown me how crucial independent journalism is in giving voice to underrepresented communities.
Your support is what allows us to tell these stories, bringing attention to the issues that are often overlooked. Without your contributions, these voices might not be heard.
Every dollar you give helps us continue to shine a light on these critical issues in the run up to the election and beyond
Eric Garcia
Washington Bureau Chief
The bad news is not even love can save us now. It would appear that the title of Channel 4’s End of the World Night on Saturday was more eye-catching hyperbole than serious prophecy. The title actually referred to a list programme counting down the 10 greatest threats to humanity, with a little help from the experts – and a lot of help from Hollywood disaster movies.
Responding to clips from movies, geologists, statisticians and journalists dismissed the risk of alien invasion and super volcanos, while warning against complacency regarding asteroids and global pandemic. “An important maxim is the unfamiliar is not the same as the improbable,” said twinkly-eyed Astronomer Royal Martin Rees, looking for all the world like he might positively enjoy a giant asteroid collision.
It might have been better if there’d been more from the likes of Rees and less from the movies. When it comes to matters of such importance, you ideally want key information sourced from a real scientist, not just Dustin Hoffman playing a “maverick scientist” in the 1995 film Outbreak.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments