Confessions of a Copper, Channel 4, TV review: ‘Legality? What’s that got to do with anything?’

This instalment, speaking to “ordinary” policemen, was a dizzying, unsatisfying history of the UK police force, told through archive footage and (often unlikeable) talking heads

Sally Newall
Thursday 20 November 2014 01:00 GMT
Comments
Hardened case: ‘Confessions of a Copper’ heard from Stephen Hayes
Hardened case: ‘Confessions of a Copper’ heard from Stephen Hayes (Pro Co/Channel 4)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Given that we read articles about alleged police corruption almost daily, it’s mind-boggling to think how bad the “bad old days” must have been.

Confessions of a Copper (Channel 4) promised to shock – and it did, perhaps not for the right reasons.

This instalment, speaking to “ordinary” policemen (teachers and doctors will follow), was a dizzying, unsatisfying history of the UK police force, told through archive footage and (often unlikeable) talking heads.

The “brave” coppers were reduced to superficial caricatures who revealed very little. While many of the anecdotes were fascinating and shocking in equal measure – from fiddling forensics to routine sexual harassment– the stories lost impact thanks to a lack of facts and contributors so obnoxious, you ended up wanting to hurl something at the television.

“You were performing good old British justice, and if that meant bending a bit of the evidence, you did it,” said Stephen Hayes, former CID man-turned-whistleblower. He told us about the hair-in-any-balaclava trick, a grubby practice of framing suspects. “Legality? What’s that got to do with anything? You’re a police officer, you’ve got to find someone responsible for that offence and you did it in any which way you could,” he said.

The narrative zoomed from Sixties paddy cars “rocking” in empty car parks to Nineties never-ending bureaucracy, with little solid detail to go on. More interesting were segments on the now-defunct women’s unit, where female officers carried regulation handbags and six-inch truncheons. The archive footage was often uncredited, so it was hard to tell if we were watching a clip from Newsnight, a police film or an episode of Z-Cars crossed with Only Fools and Horses.

The only point at which this felt like a genuine documentary was the section on former inspector Alan Murray policing the infamous 1979 protest in Southall, ending in the death of Blair Peach. This was fleshed out with contemporary footage (and an appearance by a young Harriet Harman). It could have been an episode in itself; instead, it was back to the talking-head pantomime.

At the end, we heard that one contributor was now trying his hand as a stand-up comedian. The joke was on him, I think.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in