Code of a Killer, review: The true story of DNA profiling grips despite a shaky script
There's only so much the viewer can infer from endless close-ups of test tubes and pipettes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ITV has created a niche for itself in top quality, true crime dramas over recent years, but Code of a Killer, the two-parter that began last night is different from, say, The Widower or Appropriate Adult. For a start, it wasn't written by Jeff Pope. But it's also, ultimately, not the story of the depths of human depravity, but of the height of human ingenuity; how the British geneticist Alec Jeffreys developed DNA profiling techniques now used to solve crimes around the world.
ITV stalwart John Simm played Jeffreys as a slightly neglectful husband and father, who focused only on unravelling the mysteries of the genetic code. Between 1983 and 1986, while he was busy in his University of Leicester lab, another investigation was ongoing, a few miles away in the village of Narborough. Here, DCS David Baker (also a real person) was investigating the murders of two 15-year-old girls, two years apart. By 1986, Baker had a suspect, but he'd need the help of Jeffreys and a pioneering new technique to prove it.
Jeffreys and Baker (David Threlfall) are two TV character cliches working in tandem; the scatty-but-brilliant man of science and the dour-but-determined detective. Threlfall, with his shambling walk and grey mac, inhabited the cliche so beautifully, he was a pleasure to watch. Take note, ITV, here is an actor clearly in search of his own long-running detective series. Sadly, the same couldn't be said of Simm as Jeffreys. It wasn't a bad performance, but Michael Crompton's script never quite got to grips with the science or managed to convey why Jeffrey's discovery was of such huge significance.
There's only so much the viewer can infer from endless close-ups of test tubes and pipettes. As a crime drama, it was on much more confident ground, delivering a cliffhanger that should have you on tenterhooks before next week's conclusion.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments