Right of Reply: George B Kirya
The Ugandan High Commissioner replies to our recent report on civil rights abuses in his country
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.YOUR ARTICLE entitled "Uganda abuses bring regime of fear back to heart of Africa" was filled with many untruths. For almost two decades after independence in 1962, Uganda suffered from economic chaos, lawlessness, human rights violations, dictatorship, instability and war. This situation was resisted by Ugandans and in 1986, a new government took over, in order to end state-inspired violence against the population, restore democracy and revive the economy.
Political sanity has since been restored and the culture of democracy and constitutionalism entrenched. The country has a directly elected President as well as grassroot-based democracy. There is rule of law in the country and human rights are guaranteed by the Constitution. Institutional mechanisms have been put in place to safeguard the rights of the people. One such institution is the independent Uganda Human Rights Commission.
The government is steadfast in its commitment to safeguard the rights of the people and nobody is an exception. The Internal Security Organisation (ISO) referred to in the article, is an accountable organisation which operates within the remit of the law. Comparing ISO to former security agencies, because it uses the same building is absurd. Operations by ISO and other security forces in the discharge of their duties are not along sectarian lines e.g. religion and tribe, but are done professionally and objectively.
Since 1986, the government has had to contend with lawlessness and rebellion from elements of the former regimes. The national army and the security agencies have succeeded in defeating these elements, who have now resorted to cowardly terrorist attacks. They have murdered, maimed and abducted innocent civilians and the government is determined to stop their activities and it will not compromise in dealing with terrorism. The government is committed to ensuring that all those apprehended get the fair, speedy, and public trials before courts of law.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments