Philharmonia Orchestra / Sokhiev / Pletnev, Royal Festival Hall, London

Adrian Jack
Thursday 27 November 2003 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Mikhail Pletnev is a pianist who illuminates aspects of a work that others overlook. He has his detractors, and his way with the Viennese classics has sometimes been distinctly capricious - he is certainly not one to leave the lily ungilded.</p>As he opened his cycle of Rachmaninov piano concertos with the Philharmonia Orchestra, his volatile attack - positively savage on his explosive entry - and his delight in savouring the perfume of the more languorous episodes - suspending time over individual notes as if he were holding a gemstone up to the light - drew attention to the patchwork nature of the First Concerto's opening movement. (That is partly the result of Rachmaninov's revision, in which he deleted transitional passages and changed the ending to make it more intense.)</p>If you had not found Pletnev's phrasing in the lyrical part of the cadenza irresistibly sexy and his opening solo in the middle movement a marvel of sophisticated blandishment, or had you not been riveted by the subtle shading and timing of his dialogue with the orchestra based on the slow second theme in the final movement, you should not - and probably would not - have been there in the first place.</p>In the 25-year-old conductor, Tugan Sokhiev, the music director of Welsh National Opera since last January, Pletnev had a strong and evidently appreciative partner. A past pupil of the celebrated teacher Ilya Musin, this handsome, though not very tall, young man cut an authoritative figure. Wielding one of the shortest batons I have seen, and encouraging his musicians with flashing smiles and very specific attention to individual sections, he drew a firm line throughout Rachmaninov's Second Symphony and balanced its textures judiciously: if the brass all but drowned the strings briefly at a climax, it had to be. He knew when to leave alone, too, so that Mark van de Wiel could create a mood of flawless calm with his endless clarinet solo in the slow movement.</p>Rachmaninov's Third Piano Concerto, written two years after the Second Symphony, is on a comparably epic scale. What happened to Rachmaninov between writing his First Piano Concerto in 1890 and revising it in 1917 must have been a kind of awakening, by which he recognised what was essential and what was merely conventional: he learnt not to lose control of tension, particularly harmonic tension. In the intervening years, he also grew, quite literally in terms of length, as a composer, so that he was able to plan works, such as the Second Symphony, on an epic scale - in particular, the Third Piano Concerto. </p> The Rachmaninov Concerto cycle ends at the Royal Festival Hall tonight (0800 652 6717)</i> </p>

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in