Konstantin Lifschitz, Wigmore Hall, London<img src="http://www.independent.co.uk/template/ver/gfx/threestar.gif"></img >

Bayan Northcott
Monday 08 January 2007 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In 1994, a 17-year old Russian-born pianist named Konstantin Lifschitz had the temerity to issue a recording of Bach'sGoldberg Variations,which won him international attention and a Grammy nomination. Thirteen years on, he appears before a packed Wigmore Hall to meet the still more formidable challenge of unfolding the entire Book 1 - 100 minutes of florid and densely contrapuntal writing in all 24 keys of Bach'sWell-Tempered Clavier.

Bach himself would never have imagined such a presentation. His 24 preludes and fugues were designed primarily as teaching pieces, and ordered to demonstrate the advantages of a particular kind of tuning. And under drily didactic or ploddingly reverential fingers, an integral performance can be something of an endurance test. Yet here there was never a dead bar.

In part, this was due to Lifschitz's sovereign technique, with scarcely a finger slip or lapse in concentration the entire evening. Variations of touch, tone and pedalling were not only sensitive, with bell-like upper lines and beautifully weighted chordal sonorities, but almost invariablyfunctional, highlighting structural change. Indeed, Lifschitz seemed so technically secure that he could risk rethinking, rephrasing and re-expressing the music even as he played it.

Sometimes he did surprising things that one felt might seem more questionable on repetition: suddenly switching the dynamic level from soft to loud in mid flow, say, to hold the attention through a long, densely worked fugue such as Number 20 in A minor. Or he might suddenly slow the tempo and haze the texture in pedal towards the end of a prelude such as the lilting Number 9 in E major. Yet one was generally convinced that the aliveness of his playing lay in the one-off nature of these nuances.

Indeed he gave us a demonstration. Returning at the end to acknowledge his ovation, he began to play again the familiar prelude Number 1 in C major. It was clear why. What, two and a half hours earlier, had necessarily sounded tentative, now bloomed and pulsed in a fullness and completion of feeling. It was the most magical moment in a deeply satisfying evening.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in