Album: Editors <!-- none onestar twostar threestar fourstar fivestar -->

The Back Room, KITCHENWARE

Andy Gill
Friday 22 July 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Like so many of the new wave of British and American bands, this debut from the hotly tipped Editors reminds one of an older new wave whose innovations have been "borrowed" lock, stock and barrel, with little apparent extra input from the band. As with The Killers, the piercing, anthemic guitar rock of Editors' "Lights" and "Munich" simply makes me wonder whether this younger band will fare better with its Echo & The Bunnymen tropes than Ian McCulloch has managed for the past decade or two. As for "Blood", with its rhyming of "process" and "promise", and its claim that "This wicked city will drag you down", it's hard to recall a song that more brazenly apes the sombre, dystopian rush of Joy Division - unless it's the ensuing "Fall", which even borrows certain chord clusters from "Shadowland" (I think) in its attempt to span the gap between early-Eighties industrial indie-rock and the stadium-sized mewling self-pity of Coldplay, Keane et al. Editors appear no better nor worse than their contemporaries in copying the musical styles and urban alienation of that era, but that's immaterial. If Joy Division and the Bunnymen had themselves so slavishly copied the modes of a quarter-century before, they would not even have been playing rock'n'roll, but bowdlerised light-entertainment pop. Are we wrong to expect the "new" to be new?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in