replay; Vaughan Williams: Symphonies Nos 4 & 6 London Philharmonic Orchestra / Sir Adrian Boult (Recorded 1953) (Belart 461 117-2)
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir Adrian Boult's interpretative axis might be summed up in just two words: balance and clarity. And if ever those subtlest of qualities were of crucial importance, it's here, in Vaughan Williams's most disturbing symphonies.
Boult habitually avoids a level of dramatic overkill which, in the Fourth Symphony especially, can so easily turn genuine terror into a sort of Dad's Army melodrama. Here, however, the savage opening Allegro builds magnificently and the work's closing peroration punches rather than flails.
The Sixth Symphony is, if anything, finer still: even the first movement's "big tune" is beautifully integrated into the structure, while the second movement's pensive Moderato suggests drumming fingers near the Red Button (try the Shostakovich-style string writing at 6'34": London and Leningrad have never sounded closer). Perhaps the Scherzo is a mite underpowered, at least initially - although it tenses virtually by the second.
And then there's Boult's masterly control of the Epilogue's desolate no-man's land - "a wonderful feat of endurance", to quote the composer's poignant speech at the end of the disc; "and it wasn't merely 'not playing loud': it was a positive, sensitive pianissimo, full of meaning and tension." The mono transfers are excellent.
Taneyev: Suite de Concert
David Oistrakh (violin)
Philharmonia Orchestra / Nicolai Malko
Miaskovsky: Cello Concerto
Mstislav Rostropovich (cello)
Philharmonia Orchestra / Sir Malcolm Sargent
(Recorded: 1956)
(EMI Matrix 7243 5 65419 2 4)
Composer, theorist and pedagogue, Sergei Taneyev never accepted payment from private pupils, and when, in 1905, 25 Russian musicians signed a declaration protesting against the political oppression of the Tsar's government, he was one of the signatories. Taneyev was equally sensitive "on the stave", so to speak; in fact, he was a far more inventive composer than many people give him credit for.
His technically demanding 45-minute Suite de Concert was dedicated to Leopold Auer and runs the stylistic gamut from post-classical elegance (a winsome "Gavotte") through Tchaikovskian melancholy (the opening "Praludium") and fantasy (a charming "Fairy Tale") to Neapolitan high spirits (the closing "Tarantella"). It's a piquantly orchestrated, indelibly memorable score, one that - in this particular recording - is granted a superlative performance.
David Oistrakh's rounded tone and cultivated musicianship here receive sensitive support from the Philharmonia Orchestra under Nicolai Malko; while, in Nicolai Miaskovsky's thoughtful but musically varied Cello Concerto, Sir Malcolm Sargent traces the score's every subtle nuance and Mstislav Rostropovich extracts a maximum of expressive potential from the solo line.
Both recordings sound exceptionally good for their age, albeit from beneath a quiet tape hiss. Essential fare for all musical explorers.
ROBERT COWAN
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments