SoundCloud being sued by PRS for Music for not paying its members
Royalties body says it has failed 'numerous times to recognise its responsibilities'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PRS for Music, which represents the rights of over 111,000 musicians in the UK and distributes royalties owed to them for their music, has decided to sue SoundCloud after negotiations stagnated.
“After careful consideration, and following five years of unsuccessful negotiations, we now find ourselves in a situation where we have no alternative but to commence legal proceedings against the online music service SoundCloud,” it said in a letter to members.
The organisation said it had made the “difficult decision” to begin litigation because SoundCloud “continues to deny it needs a PRS for Music licence” despite being asked “numerous times to recognise their responsibilities”.
SoundCloud has hit a major milestone! What’s your personal #SCMilestone?
Posted by SoundCloud on Wednesday, April 29, 2015
PRS documents proof of this, saying that the service only removed 250 posts from the list of 4,500 created by members.
SoundCloud says it is taking PRS’ claims “extremely seriously”, but claims the legal notice is “entirely devoid of merit and foundation, and it is our intention to vigorously defend and contest the claim."
"SoundCloud is a platform by creators, for creators. We respect creators and their work, and give all copyright owners full control over their content on the platform," it added. "We are working hard to create a platform where all creators can be paid for their work, and already have deals in place with thousands of copyright owners, including record labels, publishers and independent artists.”
It’s a murky area, as while plenty of copyrighted material does end up on SoundCloud unlawfully, many bands wilfully use it when starting out to increase their fanbase to a point where they can then hopefully monetise their output through labels and other mediums.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments