Pink Floyd win court battle with EMI
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Pink Floyd won a ruling at the High Court today which will bar record company EMI selling single downloads from their concept albums.
The band was apparently successful over a challenge on the level of royalties paid by the record company but this part of the judgment was held in secret.
Chancellor Sir Andrew Morritt accepted arguments by the group that EMI was bound by a contract forbidding it to sell its records other than as complete albums without written consent.
The judge said the purpose of a clause in the contract was to "preserve the artistic integrity of the albums".
Pink Floyd alleged and EMI agreed that it had allowed online downloads from the albums and had allowed parts of tracks to be used as ringtones.
The record company had argued that the contract related only to physical records and not to online distribution.
Sir Andrew granted the band the declaration they sought - that the contract means EMI is not entitled to exploit recordings by online distribution or by any other means other than the complete original album without Pink Floyd's consent.
EMI had successfully applied to the court for the royalties aspect to be kept secret for reasons of "commercial confidentiality".
Lawyers said it was the first time a royalties dispute between artists and their record companies had been held in private, excluding the media and public.
Enjoy unlimited access to 100 million ad-free songs and podcasts with Amazon Music
Sign up now for a 4 month free trial (3 months for non-Prime members)
Enjoy unlimited access to 100 million ad-free songs and podcasts with Amazon Music
Sign up now for a 4 month free trial (3 months for non-Prime members)
Sir Andrew ordered EMI to pay Pink Floyd's costs of the case, estimated at £60,000, and refused the company permission to appeal.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments