Frank Ocean might be sued by Universal Music for independently releasing Blond

Justin Carissimo
New York
Friday 26 August 2016 04:53 BST
Frank Ocean at Bonnaroo 2014.
Frank Ocean at Bonnaroo 2014. (Jason Merritt/Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Last week, Frank Ocean dropped two albums to satisfy fans who waited more than four years to hear new music from the gifted R&B singer-songwriter. He released his visual album, Endless, on August 19 and another album, Blond, on the following day, both exclusively streaming on Apple Music.

Endless fulfilled Ocean’s contractual agreement with Def Jam, which is owned by Universal Music Group, and Blond was released on his own independent label, Boys Don’t Cry.

Def Jam spent approximately $2 million to record both of Ocean’s albums, unnamed sources close to the situation told Billboard, a price that Ocean paid back the label in full.

Independently releasing the 17-track album Blond, Ocean rose his total revenue earnings from 14 percent to 70 percent in the 24-hour period, pulling a fast one of the biggest music labels in the game.

If Ocean's contract included a minimum delivery clause, he would need to deliver each album within a set time frame and a level of quality accepted by his label. Most recording contracts also create a window of time when their artists cannot release music on another label.

While Universal Music Group may have the grounds to pursue legal action, Billboard reports that no legal action is currently being considered against Ocean.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in