Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra/ Maazel, Barbican Hall, London

Edward Seckerson
Wednesday 03 March 2010 12:09 GMT
Comments

It’s interesting, not to say alarming, how variable the great Vienna Philharmonic can be.

Give them a Brahms Hungarian Dance – as Lorin Maazel did here for an encore – and they’ll sweep you off your feet, violins gorgeously throaty down on the G-string, stylistic hesitations teased and tantalising to the manner born. But ask them to play Debussy’s La Mer and they begin to sound like amateurs.

Beethoven should be a safe bet, you would think, and for the most part the 6th Symphony “Pastoral” was richly, beguilingly played. But it wasn’t the playing that was the problem. Lorin Maazel, now a sprightly 80, has a long and illustrious musical pedigree but his still exceptional technical facility and photographic memory does not extend to his taste and judgement and what began as an engagingly old-fashioned, amply sounded, account of the Pastoral eventually ground to a halt – heavy and portentous. I turned to my guest and commented: “I thought the Bruckner was tomorrow night?”

Beethoven’s opening movement is subtitled “Awakening of cheerful feelings on arriving in the country”. But how had we arrived? By air-conditioned limo? There was nothing airy or open-aired about Maazel’s delivery of the movement; the string sound was gorgeous but urbane, a country excursion recalled from the comfort of a luxury mansion. Corners were invariably turned with a gentle application of the brakes – another outmoded Maazel mannerism – and even the birdsong of the second movement (especially the mellifluous solo clarinet) was a little too “schooled”.

But in the aftermath of a storm resounding enough to suggest that hurricane Lorin had just blown in, Maazel completely subjugated the joy of the work to narcissism and presided over a “Shepherds’ Hymn” that was inexplicably slow and leaden. No fervour and certainly no uplift.

And so it continued. The last time I heard the Vienna Philharmonic play Debussy’s La Mer was under Gergiev. I thought it was simply ill-prepared. But Maazel faired even worse, his pedantic exposition of the score meeting with hesitancy and insecurity in the orchestra – and one moment of complete disintegration in the middle of the first movement.

No orchestra or conductor could make the dawn sequence of Ravel’s Daphnis et Chloé – Suite No.2 anything other than ravishing, so perfect is the scoring. I’ve heard sexier accounts, it has to be said, but at least it shimmered brilliantly. Next time, though, a big Strauss tone poem – Alpine or Domestica - might serve Maazel and the orchestra better.

http://www.edwardseckerson.biz

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in