Daniil Trifonov, Wigmore Hall

 

Michael Church
Thursday 15 March 2012 11:15 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Out of Russia, always something pianistically new. When 20 year-old Daniil Trifonov won the Tchaikovsky competition last year, it was clear he was extraordinary.

Born in Nizhniy Novgorod, but trained from the age of eight at Moscow’s fabled Gnessin school (where Evgeny Kissin had trained 20 years before), Trifonov had been allowed to let his talent grow at its own quiet pace, until he burst on the international scene with medals in the Warsaw Chopin and Tel Aviv Rubinstein competitions, as well as in Moscow’s musical equivalent of the Olympics. For his London lap of honour, he played Tchaikovsky’s ‘Piano Concerto No 1’ with the confidence of a master, displaying power in spades, crystalline passage-work, and a pearlised singing tone; his encore – Liszt’s ‘La Campanella’ – had flawless delicacy.

These same qualities were quickly apparent in his Wigmore recital, which was his lap of honour for winning the Rubinstein contest. He glided with a smile into Liszt’s arrangement of Schubert’s Fruhlingsglaube, which seemed smile back at him; the sound was exquisitely calibrated, and so it was in Die Stadt, which followed. Then came Schubert’s great Sonata in B flat major, the first of the evening’s big tests. His way with this was original, playing the first movement’s opening statement with what singers would call a whitened tone, then gradually colouring it as the layers within layers were revealed, sometimes with crashing force, sometimes as though blown by the wind. He’d chosen a Fazioli in preference to the usual Steinway, and one could see why, since in his hands much of this work was clad in subtle shades of pianissimo, and the German instrument wouldn’t have done the job as well. The Andante was rapt, the Scherzo airborne, and the pained ambiguities of the concluding Allegro were resolved with a wonderfully triumphant flourish. This was a young man’s account: time will bring more dimensions.

In four Tchaikovsky pieces d’occasion after the interval his touch had changed, with each being a vividly characterised world. Then, rounding things off with Chopin’s Opus 10 Etudes, he blew us away. The cantabile ones were a delight, and I have never heard the finger-twisters delivered with more nonchalant ease (and speed). Five quirky encores – some of dubious musical quality – had the hall on its feet, but for me dissipated the spell.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in