Andreas Staier, Wigmore Hall

 

Michael Church
Monday 19 December 2011 12:19 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ever since Glenn Gould’s best-selling recording was released in 1955, Bach’s ‘Goldberg Variations’ have been so popular as to be almost crossover fare.

Yet Gould was taking a liberty in transposing the work to the piano: before him, this massive aggregation of keyboard virtuosity had been confined to the harpsichord - for which it was written – and as such had been the province of scholars. And whether or not it was composed to allow a brilliant young harpsichordist to serenade his sleepless employer – that pleasant story is probably apocryphal – Bach’s statement of intent did indeed suggest exclusivity: ‘composed for connoisseurs, for the refreshment of their spirits’.

Following Gould’s lead this work has been translated into many other sound-worlds, including string quartets, orchestras, and even the harp. Its essentially percussive aesthetic may not lend itself to bowed strings, though at some points the harp seems oddly appropriate. But the real debate turns on a stark choice: harpsichord or piano?

Andras Schiff, whose ECM recording is admirably eloquent and thought-through, believes an hour and a quarter of unadulterated harpsichord is just too long: listeners need the piano’s richer sonic fare. Andreas Staier is a leading champion of the harpsichord, and he prefaced his Wigmore recital with an interview on Radio 3’s ‘Music Matters’ in which he persuasively argued his instrument’s case. It all boiled down to tone colour, he said: with two manuals and a variety of stops, you can highlight the intricately-woven voices in a way the one-manual piano can never do.

Beginning and ending with an exquisitely ornamented Aria, the work describes a vast circle with toccatas, elegant character-pieces, and polyphonic canons coming round repeatedly in patterns of three. Staier’s approach was altogether too brisk and businesslike, and it wasn’t until the first climactic variation – the fifteenth – that he (literally) pulled the emotional stops out, choosing a lute-effect for Bach’s sudden foray into desolation. The 25th – Wanda Landowska’s famous ‘black pearl’ – became the occasion for Staier’s next experiment with colour, with the lower manual in theorbo-mode and the upper one singing plangently. Thereafter, as the work became progressively more uplifting, Staier’s playing at last seemed to flower, and when he completed the circle both he and the Aria seemed transformed. But Gould and Schiff still get my vote.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in