Luck, By Ed Smith

How to make your fortune

Joy Lo Dico
Sunday 25 March 2012 02:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Just as Ed Smith joined Kent County Cricket Club in 1999, the team decided to professionalise itself. Along with a new practice regime that included 50 extra catches a day, the team's management banned the word "luck". No longer, as you left the pavilion padded-up, could your team-mates wish you "good luck"; nor could they say "bad luck" to soften the blow when the opposing bowler worked his magic.

This was one year after the crash of the hedge fund Long Term Capital Management, founded by Myron Scholes, the co-originator of the Black-Scholes formula which claimed to eliminate risk from options and derivative trading. LTCM discovered, at a cost of nearly $5bn during the 1998 Russian financial crisis, that practice does not make perfect. So too did Smith when he choked at the crease in his first match for Kent.

Smith's new book, Luck, gambols through a number of fields – international finance, war, sport and his own marriage – in order to investigate how chance disturbs both nature and nurture. He interviews James Watson, who co-discovered the structure of the DNA molecule which determines whether you are born with the physique of a boxer or a ballerina, and whether you will have the aptitude to be either. This is nature, one's innate form, codified.

But Watson's great 20th-century breakthrough sits uncomfortably with the fashionable modern mantra of meritocracy. By that rule, those who practise the hardest and who nurture their skills will be the best sportsmen and women. But this, argues Smith, doesn't hold. Even if tennis players were forbidden from ever practising, surely a Roger Federer would outplay his opponents through sheer raw talent?

Sport – which is Smith's strongest subject – is often more like backgammon than chess. Smith cites a US study of the National Football League which found that half the games won over the course of several seasons were done so by skill, and the other half due to good luck. Similarly, in football, the better team, despite a combination of natural and practised skill, does not automatically triumph – especially when the underdog gets a lucky goal. And football allows many such chances. "Uncertainty is a pain to predict," says Smith, "but a joy to follow."

Luck is a vast, unwieldy idea and, by its nature, unquantifiable. Smith occasionally loses command of his subject, but his book is thoughtful and thought-provoking. Take a chance on it.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in