Book review: Fatal Rivalry: Flodden, 1513, By George Goodwin

Five centuries ago, a well-equipped Scots army faced the English. The result shaped our history

Jane Jakeman
Monday 22 July 2013 10:03 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Even today, 500 years after the battle of Flodden, the roll-call of the Scottish dead is shocking, like the cemeteries of the First World War or the names engraved on the Pinkas synagogue in Prague. The Scots lost ten thousand men, with almost their entire nobility and clan chiefs, including their charismatic King, James IV. Yet they had a larger force than the English and a seemingly impregnable position.

Get money off this title at the Independent's book shop

This book banishes the simplistic idea that the Scots army which in 1513 had invaded south as far as Northumberland was a bunch of primitive stone-slingers emerging from the mists. James had some of the most sophisticated cannon in Europe plus battle-hardened soldiers, and he was an experienced and courageous leader. Too courageous, perhaps: one theory was that his insistence on leading the charge in person led to disaster, but this account brings fresh evidence to show a hidden factor beyond James' control.

It's not the only reversal of myths: here is that ultimate put-upon wife, Katherine of Aragon, acting as Regent during Henry VIII's absence on a French invasion, wishing she could send him James's body and enclosing his bloody coat instead. Her commander, Thomas Howard, Earl of Surrey, who with his two sons led the English army, took no prisoners. Contrary to the usual conditions of warfare, defeated Scots were killed on the field with no hope of ransom.

The leading characters in this sad history are portrayed with contextual explorations of the notions of Renaissance kingship, and studies of cultural and technical developments. It is shamefully surprising to learn that the biggest battleship in Europe was in fact owned by the King of Scots – his beloved "Great Michael".

George Goodwin previously wrote a gripping account of the battle of Towton, that most brutal action of the Wars of the Roses. Flodden, "the last medieval and the first modern battle", follows subsequent cultural and technical developments. Goodwin's theory is that the family which emerged most successfully from the Flodden débacle was neither the Tudors nor the Stuarts, but the Howards, whose fortunes soared.

However, James, who according to the portrait reproduced here has a strong claim to be the handsomest man in history, like Banquo won out genealogically. He had married Henry's sister, Margaret, bequeathing a claim to the English throne to his descendant, who eventually triumphed as James I of England and VI of Scotland.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in