Book of a lifetime: Nonsense Omnibus, By Edward Lear
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.My copy of Edward Lear's Nonsense Omnibus shows why bookbinding is not a task for the young. The spine has been reattached upside-down. There are no cover boards, but sticky-backed plastic has been applied at a jaunty angle to the title page, preserving crumbs and ink-splotches, my name written in a child's wobbly joined-up, and a sum in blue pencil, confidently underlined: 191-150=15.
Not much has changed. I still simultaneously fetishise and desecrate my favourite books; I remain incapable of writing legibly, doing a sum, leaving paper undoodled, remembering to use a plate. And I remember Lear's long nonsense poems, his pen-and-ink illustrations, the silliness of his alphabets, better than almost anything else I have read.
I was introduced to them by my beloved father, a fantastically brainy and hard-working man with a very silly sense of humour. He read to me Molesworth and "Hiawatha", still recites bits of Ancient Greek and Douglas Adams at embarrassing moments, and my love of books, my enthusiasms and tendency to giggle are all his fault. I don't know how he came to these poems, but reading aloud was genius; it's what Lear is for.
Re-reading, I don't even recognise some of the more self-consciously ridiculous work. My father may have tried them, but they didn't stick. And neither of us had much patience with the limericks; their cop-out last lines were more irritating than amusing, and I hadn't heard of half the locations: Nepaul; Kamschatka; Mold. Chertsey! But the equally repetitive Nonsense Alphabets made us helpless with laughter: "A was once an Apple-pie/Pidy/Widy/Tidy/Pidy/Nice-insidy/Apple pie." Why? Was it the fun of predicting the (terrible) rhyme? The silliness? "The Akond of Swat" is even more satisfying; it is impossible not to try to guess the rhymes, and Lear has put them in capitals, to encourage shouting. Lear is perhaps at his most brilliant in this poem, with its mad specificity: "At night if he suddenly screams and wakes/ Do they bring him only a few small cakes/ or a LOT?"
I realise now that I don't know this book at all; it's just that the protagonists of a tiny number of poems are embedded in my faulty memory: the Jumblies' terrifying sea-voyage, the lonely Quangle-Wangle. And the Owl and the Pussy-cat, whose story I know by heart. At nursery school, I appeared in an adaptation of this poem as the Turkey, in fluffy orange jacket. I recite it to anyone who will let me; it is much abused, too familiar, but a part of me.
Charlotte Mendelson's new novel, 'Almost English' (Mantle), has been long-listed for the Man Booker Prize
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments