Roth's rift with Booker judges fails to reach a happy ending
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Rarely has a relationship between prize-winner and receiver been as fraught as the one between Philip Roth and the judges of the Man Booker International award.
After one of the three judges on the panel resigned last month in protest over Mr Roth being award the prestigious prize, another judge on the panel last night admitted how the author's novels make him want to pour a bucket of cold water over his head.
Rick Gekoski, a writer and book dealer who chaired the prize-giving panel, said of Roth's work: "I can recall few of his novels that don't provoke an occasional but overwhelming desire to shout, 'Will you shut up!' At a character or his author."
Mr Gekoski did concede that Mr Roth's latest novel Nemesis was a "masterpiece".
Mr Roth did not travel to London to accept his £60,000 prize – which recognises a novelist's overall contribution to literature – with the award instead being accepted by the writer and academic Hermione Lee.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments