Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Philip K. Dick estate up in arms over Nexus One

Relax News
Friday 08 January 2010 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Google's new mobile phone, the Nexus One, is under scrutiny from the estate of the late science-fiction author Philip D. Dick. The author's family sent a letter to the internet giant on Wednesday asking the company to cease using the name, which it says is lifted from Dick's 1968 novel Do Android's Dream of Electric Sheep?.

In Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, a bounty hunter chases androids called Nexus-6 models. One of Dick's best-known works, the novel inspired the 1982 cult film Blade Runner.

The Nexus One phone is based on Google's Android software, which the company first launched two years ago. Isa Dick Hackett, the author's daughter, says the fact that the Nexus One runs the Android software makes the connection all the more obvious.

"It's not lost on the people who are somewhat familiar with this novel," Isa Dick Hackett, daughter of the author, was quoted as saying in the Wall Street Journal. "We feel this is a clear infringement of our intellectual-property rights."

When the device was introduced on Tuesday, Google said it intended the word simply to describe "a place where things converge." Neither Google or estate lawyers have so far commented on the infringement accusations.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in