Melville House and Penguin Random House engage in hilarious Twitter brawl
'Today I ignored Melville House's weekly thirst tweet' - 'It's hard not to sound a little thirsty when you're on fire'
![](https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2015/10/18/13/download.jpeg)
Your support helps us to tell the story
In my reporting on women's reproductive rights, I've witnessed the critical role that independent journalism plays in protecting freedoms and informing the public.
Your support allows us to keep these vital issues in the spotlight. Without your help, we wouldn't be able to fight for truth and justice.
Every contribution ensures that we can continue to report on the stories that impact lives
![Head shot of Kelly Rissman](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/kelly-rissman.png)
Kelly Rissman
US News Reporter
Twitter’s a beautiful yet odd place. Not only can you witness people publically arguing back and forth but you can also see rival publishing houses having at it.
On 17 October, Melville House and Penguin Random House engaged in a hilarious Twitter brawl, taking pot shots at each other.
It all started with Melville House - an independent publishers in New York - posting a photoshopped picture of a cap being placed on their HQ, with the caption “LOWER, goddammit, LOWER”.
Penguin Random House immediately seized the opportunity to mock them, tweeting back “Don't you have work to do?”. What ensued was one of the most brilliantly bizarre Twitter brawls the book world has ever seen.
"Today I ignored Melville House's weekly thirst tweet" - "It's hard not to sound a little thirsty when you're on fire"
Not what you expect to see on Twitter from two publishing houses. What a time to be alive.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments