The Word On: The Man Booker Judges

Friday 24 October 2008 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Right book, wrong judges. Congratulations to Aravind Adiga. He deserves his praise. I only wish I could say the same of the judges... The long-list was a dismal choice, omitting many clearly better-written books. Please, Booker committee, could we have a better judging panel this year, and can we stop sacrificing literary excellence for populism?

Redbrown (www.themanbookerprize.com)

[Judge] Louise Doughty reckons that male academics... choose "the literary and the obscure to impress their colleagues". She must be right... if we take a look at the last, say, ten books to win... we'll find such obscure, rebarbative and arcane titles as 'Life of Pi', 'Vernon God Little' and 'The Inheritance of Loss'. [These winners] aren't the dreadful, sentimental tosh I took them to be but are, it would seem, inaccessible and highbrow.

Mark Thwaite (www.readysteadybook.com)

Isn't the sole reason of a literary prize to heap praise on exciting authors... and not to highlight the conflicting opinions of those selecting each title? Shouldn't any panel of judges remain... outside the media glare, especially in the run-up to the award itself?

Lee Rourke (www.3ammagazine.com)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in