The Klimt row continues: Swedish family are the latest to claim rightful ownership of work exhibited at National Gallery
The unfinished portrait was taken by the Nazis in 1939
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Swedish family has stepped into the growing international row over the provenance of a Gustav Klimt painting currently being exhibited at the National Gallery in London, and claimed rightful ownership of a work taken by the Nazis in 1939.
Descendants of Amalie Zuckerkandl, whose unfinished portrait is the centrepiece of Facing the Modern: The Portrait in Vienna in 1900, say they should receive the artwork when the exhibition finishes in January. Austria was awarded ownership by an arbitration panel in 2007.
The Swedes' intervention follows a report in last week's IoS that a US-based lawyer, E Randol Schoenberg, was pressing for the unfinished portrait to be returned to the Austrian family that he claims are its rightful owners.
In a letter to the gallery and seen by The Independent on Sunday, Carl Magnus Lilienberg, representing the Müller Hofmanns in Stockholm, writes: "(My clients') Jewish grandmother Hermine Müller Hofmann was the daughter of Amalie Zuckerkandl. Hermine Müller Hofmann owned and possessed the painting [and] was forced to 'sell' it for an unreasonable low price to raise money to escape the Nazis."
Mr Schoenberg dismissed the claim by the Müller-Hofmann family, calling it "as laughable as the decision by the arbitration panel".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments