Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Major new Rubens exhibition will feature newly discovered work

 

Nick Clark
Friday 05 September 2014 22:29 BST
Comments
The Rape of the Daughters of Leucippus, 1610-11
The Rape of the Daughters of Leucippus, 1610-11 (The National Museum of Art, Architecture and Design, Oslo)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

A major new exhibition focused on old master painter Peter Paul Rubens in London is to include the recent “big discovery” of a genuine work, which had been written off as a fake for six decades.

The Royal Academy of Arts is to stage the first UK exhibition concentrating on the influence of the Flemish painter who died in 1640, which opens in January.

Nico Van Hout, curator of the exhibition, discovered the small panel titled The Rape of the Daughters of Leucippus on a chance trip to the National Museum of Art Architecture and Design in Oslo and was convinced it was by Rubens.

“It’s not normally the first place you would look for old masters,” he said. “We discovered this in a dark corner of the room.”

The work is believed to have been painted in 1610 or 1611 and is the first time Rubens covered the subject matter he returned to most famously less than a decade later in the painting of the same name that hangs in the Alte Pinakothek in Munich.

The work was declared a fake by eminent Rubens scholar Julius Held in 1950, and Mr Van Hout said no one had questioned it since.

“It was amazing when I saw it,” he said. “I’m convinced it’s genuine as are many of my colleagues. Otherwise I wouldn’t put it in the exhibition.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in