Michael Glover: You could call Wright's art minimalist, but it is also luxurious

Tuesday 08 December 2009 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The least demonstrative and the most unassuming of this year's nominees wins the Turner Prize for a painting-cum-drawing that covers an entire wall at Tate Britain – yes, that's (almost) all there is, my friends – and which is likely to disappear when the show is over.

The judges have once again opted for an art which pays homage to restrained, non-figurative patterning – as it did in 2006 when the prize was won by an interesting abstract painter called Tomma Abts.

Richard Wright is into a kind of laboriously hand-crafted repetitive patterning that often makes for an almost invisible art – in a certain light over at Tate Britain, you can barely see it at all. Last time he had a show in London, I had to look hard to find the work, because there was nothing at all on the floor or the walls.

The main piece was up on the ceiling, where I had forgotten to look, and another in an out-of-the-way back room.

Its roots are in traditions of Islamic calligraphy, or even decorative fabrics. Like Carl André – another man made famous by the Tate (in his case for a configuration of bricks) – Wright walks into the space empty-handed, without finished works. He sizes it up. Then he draws, in situ, on its surfaces, responding to its shape, its atmosphere, the context of what he has been invited to appropriate, engulf, characterise, re-define.

But only temporarily. These drawings don't go anywhere. Nobody tries to peel them off the walls. They remain for the duration, they are documented with photographs, and then they are destroyed.

Wright makes an art which alludes to the passing nature of life and the necessary impermanence of art. The whole enterprise, here on this wall, seems so tentative, as if it were a kind of effrontery to do any more. You could call his art minimalist. But it is also, for all its ethereal nature, luxurious in its way; a luxury that always threatens to pass away, and after a while does.

Best of '09: Were you impressed by Richard Wright's work? Was the Turner Prize show the most memorable arts event of 2009? We want to hear about your favourite cultural moments of the year. In the comments form below or at www.independent.co.uk/bestof09 nominate your favourite - in film, music, theatre, comedy, dance or visual arts - with a brief explanation as to why it tops your list and we'll print a selection in The Independent Readers' Review of 2009.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in