Architects slam 'shameful shoe-box homes'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Architects have criticised the "shameful shoe-box homes" being built in Britain today, saying many are too small for family life.
Research by the Royal Institute of British Architects (Riba) found the floor area of the average new three-bedroom home in the UK is 88 sq m, some 8 sq m short of the recommended space.
One-bedroom properties, at an average of 46 sq m, are 4 sq m smaller than the recommended size, the Case For Space study found.
This is the equivalent of a single bed, a bedside table and a dressing table with a stool, the report said.
In reports published today, Riba chief executive Harry Rich said: "Our homes should be places that enhance our lives and well-being.
"However, as our new research confirms, thousands of cramped houses - shameful shoe-box homes - are being churned out all over the country, depriving households of the space they need to live comfortably and cohesively."
The institute's study of three-bedroom houses was based on a sample of 3,418 homes across 71 sites in England.
The research was based on the London Plan space standards which have recently been introduced into the capital.
However, the Home Builders Federation said bigger homes could prove unaffordable.
Andrew Whitaker, the federation's head of planning, told the BBC that increasing standards would increase costs, adding: "That's going to mean houses are going to become more expensive and we're already suffering from a lack of affordability for young people and first-time buyers."
A spokesman for the Department for Communities and Local Government said: "Developers must deliver the homes that communities need and buyers want - and that includes ensuring the homes they build meet families' needs.
"That's why ministers scrapped the minimum density targets that they argue contributed to a lack of family-sized homes and flats that are so in demand.
"But key to this is putting local communities themselves in control, which is why, under our planning reforms, neighbourhoods will be able to design and vote on their own plans for the future of their areas, giving them the chance to exercise meaningful choice over the type and size of homes that are built, and giving developers the chance to benefit from a smoother process for getting planning permission by working with local people from the start."
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments