Your view

Is there anyone a ‘changed Labour’ wouldn’t accept?

Letters to the editor: our readers share their views. Please send your letters to letters@independent.co.uk

Friday 10 May 2024 10:08 BST
Comments
Surely, new MPs must have some loose, tenuous, hint of a link to whatever values and principles you hold as a political party?
Surely, new MPs must have some loose, tenuous, hint of a link to whatever values and principles you hold as a political party? (PA)

Reading John Rentoul today I can totally understand why, for short-term tactical gain, Labour would accept Natalie Elphicke and welcome her defection. But it obviously raises the question of whether there is anyone who a “changed Labour Party” wouldn’t accept? Would Nigel Farage, 30p Lee, Jacob Rees-Mogg or a coach tour from the European Research Group now fit the bill?

Because the point, surely, should be that new MPs must have some loose, tenuous, hint of a link to whatever values and principles you hold as a political party... unless you don’t have any in the first place, in which case come one, come all.

Hopefully, Donald Trump may be free come December to do a photo-op in Florida with a smiling Kier Starmer welcoming him as the new foreign secretary.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in