Letter: A symbol worth saving
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GEOFFREY LEAN may well be correct in identifying whaling as relatively unimportant environmentally ('Lift the ban, save the whale', 22 May), but he fails to appreciate that the whale itself is not. Campaigners over the past 25 years who have campaigned for the whale's salvation understood very early on that the call to 'Save the Whale', was in fact a call to save the planet. The whale became a test of man's willingness to preserve the environment.
The suggestion that the minke whale is numerous enough in the Antarctic or North-east Atlantic to sustain a small hunt is irrelevant. What is relevant is the protection of a symbol whose destruction serves few and whose preservation encapsulates a worthy ideal.
The late Sir Peter Scott's comment that 'If we cannot save the whale, we cannot save anything' rings louder and clearer as every year passes.
Nic Davies
Crowborough, East Sussex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments