LETTERS:Welsh verdict on opera design

Ewart Parkinson
Monday 12 December 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The architectural competition process for choosing a new opera house for Cardiff Bay is not proving to be a farce, and the people of Wales are not so visually illiterate as your architectural critic portrays them ("Grand Welsh opera descends into farce", 30 November). The brief envisages public consultation. It is to the credit of Associated British Ports, the Cardiff Bay Development Corporation and Grosvenor Waterside that they have sponsored a superb and informative exhibition in Cardiff, other parts of Wales and London.

The verdict of the exhibition is clear: the Welsh public objects to the Hadid design. As one Cardiff architect puts it: It is entirely out of scale and out of character with its surroundings: its form and materials are unsympathetic and inappropriate

Even the assessors expressed reservations on grounds of micro-climate, costs and functional issues which would require further evaluation.

The assessors have, however, discovered two designs of quality - those of Foster and Hasegawa - and one that is brilliant - Nicoletti's. Nicoletti's design envisages a crystal wave shell which is complex yet with an underlying simplicity of concept. The people of South Wales are recognising this as elegant and truly beautiful. No one in the debate so far has had the temerity to apply the word "beautiful" to the Hadid building.

A fundamental condition for millennium funding - crucial to the building of the opera house - is that the project shall have public support. It is becoming clearer that this condition can only be met by the Nicoletti design. This is not farce: it is creativity in action.

Yours faithfully, EWART PARKINSON Cardiff The writer is a former president of the Royal Town Planning Institute.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in