Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your expose of the fiddles of unemployment figures is extremely timely. The fact that the source for the details of Department of Employment statistical manipulation comes from within Whitehall and is not an opposition allegation makes them all the stronger.
All this autumn I have been sitting in the Commons listening to the Prime Minister, Chancellor, Employment Secretary and sundry MPs denounce a statutory minimum wage as a job killer. So I wrote asking for details of countries which had one and their record of job creation. In the reply from the junior Employment Minister, Philip Oppenheim, a clear table listed major countries around the world that had statutory minimum wage systems and which had better job creation records, since 1980, than Britain.
But when you published these figures, Mr Oppenheim wrote to you (letter, 21 December) to say that he had been wrong last week, and this week's statistical line from the DoE is that a statutory minimum wage does not help job creation. I could (but won't, for the sake of reader boredom) go through each of Mr Oppenheim's highly selective statistics, but I would like to focus on just one. He refers to America's £3 an hour minimum wage as being set at an "extremely low level". Given the pay rates of £l.80 anhour in my constituency of Rotherham, let me assure him that even a £3 an hour minimum wage would provide a floor to stop unfair exploitation. It would also stop taxpayers - corporate and individual - from having to subsidise such low-pay firms through the benefit system.
Only in the two-nation Britain created by today's Tories can a massive taxpayers' subsidy to low-wage firms be considered sensible economics.
Yours, DENIS MacSHANE MP for Rotherham (Lab)
House of Commons London, SW1
21 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments