Letter: Religion's role in science
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In his remarkable display of old-fashioned scientistic zealotry (Letters, 20 March), Richard Dawkins asks: 'What has 'theology' ever said that is of the smallest use to anybody?'
One answer to his rhetorical question is this. Christian theology has proposed and articulated a vision of reality that is more essentially personal than it is material. It has therefore accredited human persons with a very high dignity indeed.
Consequently, it has provided reasons and motives for the likes of Francis of Assisi, Albert Schweitzer and Mother Teresa to devote their lives to the service of the well-being of their fellow humans.
Christianity has also, for example, provided severe moral constraints upon (medical) scientists who, through inordinate curiosity, lust for professional advancement, or utilitarian motives, have been tempted to treat their human subjects as means and not ends.
Yours faithfully,
NIGEL BIGGAR
Oxford
21 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments